At some point in the past, a Hawaiian program called HOPE for Battered Women received $156,000 from the Hawaii State Legislature. Several people were hired into this program. The money was used directly to train and hire alleged “victims” of domestic violence and to train them as counselors for domestic violence victims.
Carol Lee became the first Executive Director of the Hawaii State Coalition Against Domestic Violence (HSCADV). Subsequently, Ms. Lee has been accused of undermining the program. She is accused of misleading and manipulating the Executive Committee and of offenses that would have her jailed if her accuser was her judge.
The allegations are vague and unsubstantiated, but it appears that Ms. Lee is accused of, among other things, cutting off support and funding from a mother after the program had spent thousands of dollars helping her abduct her child from California, change her identity, and conceal the whereabouts of the child from interstate authorities.
These are the basics of a saga outlined in a rambling eleven page allegation that I will shortly post to my web site. It is not clear who made what allegations and when they were first made.
In fact, it is impossible to read the allegation letter without pondering the extensive paranoia of the person who wrote the letter. There are allegations that Ms. Lee:
“went behind our backs and worked out a deal to get rid of the program and us.”
What is clear is that, in at least one instance, the state money provided to the HSCADV was used to facilitate a child abduction across state lines.
Details of the Abduction
Ms. Lee’s accuser describes, a woman, currently known as Mahtab Trueman, and her marriage to a Navy Seal who was “a trained sharp-shooter.” This information apparently serves as evidence that she was abused.
I was a U.S. Marine. I achieved a sharp-shooter badge. Most military men get their sharp-shooter badges on the firing range in target practice well before actual combat. It’s a matter of keeping our boys alive while on the front line. In any event…
The accuser goes on to allege that Ms. Trueman was abused in “unspeakable ways.” This is typical of alleged victims who cannot “speak” of abuse because most of the alleged abuse occurs within the victim’s mind. Perhaps the alleged victim finds her marriage unspeakable. That does not make what happened “abuse.”
The accuser then states,
“In 2006, Mahtab began seeking assistance from domestic violence (DV) services in San Diego, Escondido and Temecula, CA. These services connected her with the [HSCADV] and it’s Executive Director, Carol Lee, who was coordinating with the CA services to execute a planned escape for Mahtab and her infant daughter, (child’s name withheld), to Hawaii.”
Whether or not there was an abuser, Ms. Lee is accused of coordinating a child abduction across state borders. Child abduction across state lines is a matter of Federal law governed under the terms of the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA), the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA), and the Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act (PKPA) among other statutes against violent criminal action.
Remember that the advocates involved need only have an “allegation” of abuse to commit the child abduction. They need no court approval, no oversight and no evidence has ever to be presented.
“Once Mahtab had successfully escaped her abuser she spent 140 days in the Kona, Hawaii DV shelter where she was afforded Personal Parenting and group services, individual counseling and provided supportive assistance by two of the three DV Educators at the HSCADV while maintaining ongoing contact with Ms. Lee.”
The father of this child was not given the opportunity to contest his child’s abduction before (child’s name withheld) was gone. The accuser again implicates Ms. Lee in the child abduction and scheme to conceal the child’s whereabouts from her father.
“Mahtab recalled Ms. Lee utilizing the “Daysha Aiona Flight To Freedom Fund” that provides airfare for fleeing DV victims three times in her case and said that the HSCADV also paid for the majority of the barge fee for her car to be transported from Kona to Oahu. Because the lethality in Mahtab’s case was rated so highly, the NNEDV’s Identity Change Relocation program under Valenda Applegarth was utilized and Mahtab’s social security number was successfully changed as a result. ”
In addition to funds provided by the State of Hawaii, Ms. Trueman is said to have been the beneficiary of one or more private funds for real victim’s of domestic violence. The accuser alleges that the “Daysha Aiona” fund is meant to “provide airfare for fleeing DV victims.” The NNEDV program is designed to hide a real victim from a real abuser.
In real life, however, these two programs are designed to separate families. They allow an abusive woman the power and control to destroy family bonds without the consent of the partner to whom they had previously committed their life.
There are no “lethality” provisions in Domestic Violence laws, available to the general public. But, that does not stop the accuser from leaping to the unsupported allegation that eligibility under the NNEDV Program 1) confers innocence on the part of the abductor, 2) establishes guilt of the father and 3) guarantees the absence of the child’s voice in the matter.
Ms. Trueman, it is noted, was also employed by the Domestic Violence Clearinghouse and Legal Hotline (DVCLH) a now defunct subsidiary of the HSCADV.
“While in Kona, Mahtab was attacked in broad daylight and it was feared that her abuser had located her so when Mahtab needed hospitalization for an epileptic episode, concern for her safety was so high that Ms. Lee authorized around-the-clock security services for the 3 – 4 days where Mahtab remained under observation.”
With no evidence, the accuser raises the specter that a hidden Hawaiian program of cross-border-child-abduction has been compromised. At the same time, she raises concern over an unconfirmed “attack” on a woman who is prone to epileptic seizures. The accuser raises a concern for safety from an alleged and unproven abuser that eclipses the health of the woman, the child, or the family from which the child has been abducted.
On or about September 2008, Ms. Trueman had her 16-month-old daughter removed by Ohau’s Child Protective Services. Her evidence that she was a victim of domestic violence was that she was involved with HSCADV.
“In late September of 2008, a remarried Mahtab takes now 18 month-old (child’s name withheld) to Tripler Hospital after a 105-degree fever won’t break. (child’s name withheld) is kept for observation and while at the hospital, Mahtab suffers a seizure and is provided treatment as well. After mom and daughter recover, they are discharged home together. Child Protective Services is contacted and after reviewing Mahtab’s “questionable” background information, they remove (child’s name withheld) from Mahtab’s care. ”
Ms. Trueman had gotten remarried in this brief time. For the record, whirl-wind romances are a signature trademark of an abusive and controlling person.
CPS had declared Ms Trueman as “not a bona fide victim of domestic violence.” The Guardian ad Litem in Ms. Trueman’s case is accused of calling her “a liar, a fraud and a bad mother.” Ms. Lee’s accuser notes that, in April 2009, “the now 23 month-old daughter remains hostage in non-relative foster care.”
And through all this, apparently, CPS had the wherewithal to alert the father of the daughter’s whereabouts.
“the GAL and CPS contacted Mahtab’s ex-husband who is now fully aware of mom’s location”
Oahu CPS establishes that the alleged “attack” cited above may have simply been an epileptic seizure. They confirm that there has been an interstate child abduction. Having been personally subjected to CPS investigations, and knowing how thoroughly personally intrusive they are, they may have established that the child / father relationship has been permanently damaged.
“as the GAL and CPS conduct their investigation into mom’s past, both come to doubt her authenticity as a DV victim.”
No harm has come to mother or child from the disclosure to the “alleged” abuser / father. Instead the accuser lists the out-of-pocket expenses of the abductor; legal services, therapy, and substance abuse testing.
The accuser is concerned about the program’s $22,000 outlay of HSCADV grant money having been spent on the mother / abductor including monies spent on her education and training as another domestic violence victim “advocate.”
Who better than a false victim of domestic violence; coerced, cajoled, or enthusiastically, taking up the mantle of DV advocate against unsuspecting fathers who simply want to keep their families together during the emotional separations which we now know are partially supported by state governments?
Who is the accuser? None other than the mother of my own children.
But, there’s more…
STAY TUNED FOLKS.
For more information on child-abduction, visit my web site at http://www.mywiferanoffwithourkids.com/